Cardiac
resynchronization therapy (CRT) became available in the late 1990s, offering a
safe and effective treatment for patients suffering from heart failure with
left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF<35%) and electrical
dyssynchrony (QRS duration ≥ 120 ms) . However, positive clinical response
is observed in only 60- 70% of the treated population, and significant echocardiographic
remodeling is observed in 50-60% of the treated population . The reasons for
“non-response” seem to be multifactorial, while different studies have used
different definitions of echocardiographic and clinical factors to indicate
positive response . Using different criteria for response in different studies
makes it difficult to make head-to-head comparison of outcome and results as
different subpopulations of “responders” may be examined, and there may thus be
different implications for clinical outcomes.
Additional data from biochemical markers such
as NT-proBNP carries a prognostic value in CRT patients, and postoperative
reduction has been shown to correlate to reduced long-term mortality .
Monitoring NTproBNP may therefore help more easily identify primarily the
nonresponders for early intervention and more intensive care with a view to
improving their quality of life and clinical outcome. Our study sought to compare
baseline NT-proBNP levels in relation to clinical and echocardiographic
positive response to CRT, and also to assess the association between the extent
of change in NT-proBNP levels with echocardiographic and/or clinical response.
No comments:
Post a Comment