The
present algorithm for the treatment of cardiac arrest relies on the paramount
difference as to whether the underlying rhythm is shockable or not. Accordingly,
only two options exist namely a rhythm in a cardiac arrest patient can be
either shockable or not shockable. This exemplification was introduced in the
2000 Guidelines for Cardiac Arrest and Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
that overcame the previous classification which considered four main types of
rhythms (asystole, pulseless electrical activity - PEA-, ventricular
fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia) . The last two are those
requiring prompt defibrillation.
Since
then, this simplified algorithm became a standardized scheme which allowed a
more schematic approach. For the treatment of ventricular tachycardia it is
apparent that this rhythm may undergo an electrical defibrillation only in
presence of a pulseless condition which cannot be detected by any kind of
defibrillator. Indeed ventricular tachycardia may need prompt defibrillation in
case of pulseless rhythms but may require synchronized electrical cardioversion
when the patient is hemodynamically unstable but is not in cardiac arrest. Read more.................
No comments:
Post a Comment